Forum
Off Topic Battlefield 3 x Modern Warfare 3Poll
Battlefield 3 x Modern Warfare 3
Only registered users are allowed to vote
Battlefield 3 | 58.97% (69) | |
Modern Warfare 3 | 23.93% (28) | |
NONE | 17.09% (20) |
117 votes cast
Dafuq you wrote?
EP has written
I wrote something
you took a shit on your keyboard and somehow it managed to type.. shit.
But if forced to choose I'll go with BF3 because teamwork.
Mechanolith has written
I miss the old times, Call of Duty 1, 2, Medal of Honor... those games really made me have fun.
I loved medal of honor .. I had the PSP version and I would just run M1 Garand all the time(snipers without scopes? Im in). But yeah, I think guns in games like mw3 need to be customizable. (I.E. Ironsights or scopes, which kind, etc ..) And they need to get rid of this unlockable weapon crap.
Chex has written
Tribes ascend guys. It's gonna be free( @#!*% yeah!) and not be some ultra-hyper-realistic-fry-your-graphics-card-and-lag-like- @#!*% game. I'm already in the beta, and loving it.
But if forced to choose I'll go with BF3 because teamwork.
But if forced to choose I'll go with BF3 because teamwork.
Tribes Ascend... that game stopped working here, i can't uninstall it and i can't update it, amazing.
Anyway, it's too arcade-like to me, just like flying around and shooting explosives on other people, weak graphics... not my kind of game.
I'm about to buy Operation Flashpoint: Dragon Rising, but since Red River is newer, so i'm reluctant.
Anyones suggest me to buy Red River instead of Dragon Rising?
Mechanolith has written
Tribes Ascend... that game stopped working here, i can't uninstall it and i can't update it, amazing.
Anyway, it's too arcade-like to me, just like flying around and shooting explosives on other people, weak graphics... not my kind of game.
Anyway, it's too arcade-like to me, just like flying around and shooting explosives on other people, weak graphics... not my kind of game.
I like games where there's a simple premise but there are still advanced tactics/strategies related to it. Gives a game a smooth learning curve(unlike dwarf fortress) and still allows for tactical thinking. Tribes Ascend is about 10x the fun when you're on an organized team fighting an organized team. When you all know what you're doing, and you have to improvise, etc .. to outplay the other team.
This is also why I love team fortress 2 .. sort of lost hope in public games, where playing medic is either healing people as they run to their doom, jumping into the enemies like lemmings off a cliff, or sealing your own fate by walking onto the battlefield with a giant "kill me" icon over your head and no one to protect you. Pubs are still fun for me when playing with friends.
I really don't give any fucks about realism or graphics. Give me a glock and call it a machine gun, whatever.
Chex has written
This is also why I love team fortress 2 .. sort of lost hope in public games, where playing medic is either healing people as they run to their doom, jumping into the enemies like lemmings off a cliff, or sealing your own fate by walking onto the battlefield with a giant "kill me" icon over your head and no one to protect you. Pubs are still fun for me when playing with friends.
I only play TF2 when together with a friend, he is the only one who actually knows how to play as medic, he advises me when there are spies around, i protect him, he heals me and know how to be out of trouble while healing...
And this causes servers to get empty in less than 1 hour when we are playing, it's amazing.
Battlefield 3 is Good in Multiplayer and is good in SinglePlayer but not like COD MW3
1. You can play with your friends in 4 players
2. NightTitan Think again
My Votes
MW3 - Multiplayer - 9/10
Single-player - 8/10
Graphics - 8/10
Realism - 8/10
You cant do on BF3
1. You cant play 4 players with your friends
My Votes
BF3 - Multiplayer -5/10
Singleplayer -7/10
Graphics -7/10
Realism - 5/10
And again did you Read the News or something? or wiki?
Read Me. Awards.
Sparty has written
MW3 - Multiplayer - 9/10
Single-player - 8/10
Graphics - 8/10
Realism - 8/10
BF3 - Multiplayer -5/10
Singleplayer -7/10
Graphics -7/10
Realism - 5/10
Single-player - 8/10
Graphics - 8/10
Realism - 8/10
BF3 - Multiplayer -5/10
Singleplayer -7/10
Graphics -7/10
Realism - 5/10
you must be joking? huh
BF3 is the game with the best current fps engine you could have and you say it has worse graphics and worse realism than in MW3?
I do agree single player in BF3 sucks, however multiplayer is way better than in MW3. Tell me any game which has huge, tactical, 32 n 32 battles? none that is the main feature of BF series. Well majority of games on public servers is the mess with small amount of tactics, but clan matches are just awesome and feels like battlefield. Moreover battlefield is the best way to play with friends over the internet, because of squad system. All you need is squad up with your friends and buy a handset. Wanna see the real battlefield match, then just google "bf3 clan match/war"
NightTitan has written
MW3 - Multiplayer -6/10
Singleplayer -7/10
Graphics -9/10
Realism -6/10
BF3 - Multiplayer -10/10(Best Multiplayer game)
Singleplayer -7/10
Graphics -10/10
Realism - 10/10
BF3 Is winner
Singleplayer -7/10
Graphics -9/10
Realism -6/10
BF3 - Multiplayer -10/10(Best Multiplayer game)
Singleplayer -7/10
Graphics -10/10
Realism - 10/10
BF3 Is winner
Admin/mod comment
§2.4 - Use tags sparingly and only when they add value Sparty has written
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battlefield_3#Awards
Battlefield seems to have more awards.
I only liked COD 4. Black ops had really good maps, unlike MW3.
Find something new to entertain the people...